Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
 71 
 on: May 24, 2016, 05:49 AM 
Started by Rad - Last post by Rad
World could warm by massive 10C if all fossil fuels are burned

Arctic would warm by as much as 20C by 2300 with disastrous impacts if action is not taken on climate change, warns new study

Damian Carrington
AFP
Monday 23 May 2016 16.00 BST

The planet would warm by searing 10C if all fossil fuels are burned, according to a new study, leaving some regions uninhabitable and wreaking profound damage on human health, food supplies and the global economy.

The Arctic, already warming fast today, would heat up even more – 20C by 2300 – the new research into the extreme scenario found.

“I think it is really important to know what would happen if we don’t take any action to mitigate climate change,” said Katarzyna Tokarska, at the University of Victoria in Canada and who led the new research. “Even though we have the Paris climate change agreement, so far there hasn’t been any action. [This research] is a warning message.”

The carbon already emitted by burning fossil fuels has driven significant global warming, with 2016 near certain to succeed 2015 as the hottest year ever recorded, which itself beat a record year in 2014. Other recent studies have shown that extreme heatwaves could push the climate beyond human endurance in parts of the world such as the Gulf, making them uninhabitable.

In Paris in December, the world’s nations agreed a climate change deal intended to limit the temperature rise from global warming to under 2C, equivalent to the emission of a trillion tonnes of carbon. If recent trends in global emissions continue, about 2tn tonnes will be emitted by the end of the century.

The new work, published in Nature Climate Change, considers the impact of emitting 5tn tonnes of carbon emissions. This is the lower-end estimate of burning all fossil fuels currently known about, though not including future finds or those made available by new extraction technologies.

The researchers used a series of sophisticated climate models and found this rise in CO2 would lead to surface temperatures rising by an average of 8C across the world by 2300. When the effect of other greenhouse gases is added, the rise climbs to 10C.

The heating predicted by the models was not uniform across the globe. In the Arctic, the higher CO2 levels led to 17C of warming, with another 3C from other greenhouse gases, across the year. These rises are higher than indicated by previous, less comprehensive models, which are less accurate at modelling how the oceans takes up heat. In February, parts of the Arctic had already recorded temperatures 16C above normal.

The warming caused by burning all fossil fuels would also have enormous impact on rainfall. The new research shows rainfall falling by two-thirds over parts of central America and north Africa and by half over parts of Australia, the Mediterranean, southern Africa and the Amazon.

Thomas Frölicher, at ETH Zürich in Switzerland and not involved in the new work, said: “Given that current trends in fossil fuel emissions would result in temperatures above [the 2C Paris] target, policymakers need to have a clear view of what is at stake both on decadal and centennial timescales if no meaningful climate policies are put in place. The unregulated exploitation of fossil fuel resources could result in significant, more profound climate change.”

 72 
 on: May 24, 2016, 05:47 AM 
Started by Rad - Last post by Rad
North Yorkshire council fracking decision a 'declaration of war'

Campaigners vow to fight council’s landmark ruling approving fracking in Kirby Misperton, near North York Moors

Nazia Parveen North of England correspondent
AFP
Tuesday 24 May 2016 12.02 BST

Anti-fracking campaigners have accused North Yorkshire council of declaring war on people’s rights to clean air and water after it approved the first operation to frack for shale gas in five years.

Campaigners opposed to the development outside Kirby Misperton – a village in Ryedale near the North York Moors national park –

launched a “people’s declaration” in an attempt to stop the process going ahead. There have also been calls for a judicial review from Friends of the Earth and Frack Free Ryedale, which led the campaign against the application by Third Energy.

They said in a statement: “We urge and will support the government to develop a balanced long-term energy policy that will achieve our globally agreed climate change targets. Today we resolve to continue to fight to remain free from fracking, to protect our communities, our beautiful countryside, our air and water, and to protect the future of the planet. We ask people across the country to join us by supporting this declaration.”

The council’s decision on Monday was met with chants of “We say no” and “You will be held accountable”.

“It is a war, now, they’ve declared on us,” said Sarah Hockey, an anti-fracking campaigner from east Yorkshire. “It’s a war on our human rights to clean air and water so we’ve got to take it like that and keep pushing and pushing and pushing.

“We need to mobilise people more. We need to inform people more. It may well be, tragically, that when the work starts and something goes wrong like it did before in Lancashire that people will be horrified and say, ‘We can’t have this’.”

Friends of the Earth said it would consider whether the decision could be challenged. Campaigner Simon Bowens said: “This is an absolute travesty of a decision but the battle is very far from over.”

One of the councillors who voted in favour of the application, Cliff Trotter, said he had received intimidating emails.

He told BBC Radio 5 Live: “Yes, a few. But that’s par for the course, I suppose. But we tried to look to the future, the best for the people of England.”

The Conservative councillor added: “I’m totally against nuclear power stations and if we’ve got the resources under the ground – we’ve got coal there, we’ve got gas there, we’re bringing it round the world to try and run this country with all these things that we’re importing. And we’ve got it on our doorstep. But it’s just how we do it.

“I’m not an expert, I’m not a professor. The number of professors that were talking – we get one saying yes, and one saying no.”

After a two-day meeting at county hall in Northallerton, councillors voted by a majority of seven to four to approve the fracking operation near Pickering.

The decision was made despite thousands of objections from residents and campaigners and will allow fracking in the UK for the first time in five years.

Fracking was halted on the Fylde coast in 2011 when tests found it was the probable cause of minor earthquakes in the area. Since then, two high-profile applications to frack in Lancashire have been rejected by councillors and are the subject of appeals.

Planners had recommended the most recent application be approved, despite acknowledging that the majority of representations received in consultation were objections.

Vicky Perkin, a council planning officer, told the committee that of 4,420 individual representations, 4,375 were objections and 36 were in support of the application to frack for shale gas at the firm’s existing well in Kirby Misperton, known as KM8.

The government has said it is going “all out for shale” to boost energy security and the economy. But opponents fear fracking – in which liquid is pumped deep underground at high pressure to fracture rock and release gas – can cause problems, including water contamination, earthquakes, and noise and traffic pollution.

Environmentalists also say that pursuing new sources of gas – a fossil fuel – is not compatible with efforts to tackle climate change.

Rasik Valand, the chief executive of Third Energy, said work would not start at the site for “months and months” and would initially be an “exploration phase”.

When asked if this was a precedent for further fracking applications to be approved, he said: “We don’t look upon it like that. We are a local company, we see ourselves as a local company. For us, this is about testing what’s in our local area.”

Ken Cronin, the chief executive of UK Onshore Oil and Gas, said it was “a very important first step”.

The chief executive of North Yorkshire council, Richard Flinton, said the decision did not mean similar approvals would follow. The chairman of the committee, Peter Sowray, said he knew people would be angry but he was “comfortable” with the decision.

A viability test lasting six to eight weeks would initially be carried out at Third Energy’s existing KM8 site. If it was found to be suitable, full-scale shale gas extraction would take place for up to nine years.

 73 
 on: May 24, 2016, 05:45 AM 
Started by Rad - Last post by Rad
South African court gives green light to domestic trade in rhino horn

Court dismisses government bid to uphold seven-year ban on domestic trade in rhino horn - but global ban remains in place

Reuters
Tuesday 24 May 2016 11.50 BST

South Africa’s supreme court has dismissed a government bid to uphold a seven-year ban on the domestic trade in rhino horn, an industry group said this week.

The decision has no bearing on a ban on international trade in rhino horn. Potential domestic buyers could include those who see rhino horn as a store of wealth that could appreciate in value and those who want it as a decoration.

Thousands of South African rhinos have been slain in recent years to meet demand for the horn in Asian countries, where buyers consider it an aphrodisiac, a cure for cancer or treatment for hangovers.

“Legal finality has now been achieved,” Pelham Jones, chairman of South Africa’s Private Rhino Owners Association (PROA), told Reuters, saying trade could resume this year.

Around 5,000 rhinos, or about a quarter of South Africa’s population, are in private hands. Rhino horn can be harvested as it grows back and it can be removed from a tranquilised animal.

The government has not revealed the size of its rhino horn stockpile but the PROA estimates its members have around six tonnes and reckons the state has close to 25 tonnes. The combined 31 tonnes could fetch $2bn by some estimates.

A spokeswoman for South Africa’s Department of Environmental Affairs said it would comment later in the day on the ruling, which was made on Friday.

It was not immediately clear if the department would now appeal to the constitutional court, the top court in the land.

Supporters of rhino horn trade say the money earned could be used for conservation and to pay for security. Opponents counter that a legal trade could tempt poachers who kill rhinos to launder their “blood” horns with clean supplies.

The decision is a setback to government efforts to keep a lid on the domestic trade in rhino horn, which was imposed in 2009. It comes just months ahead of a major UN conference on wildlife trade that South Africa will host.

The domestic trade ban was challenged by rhino owners in court last year and the moratorium was overturned.

Both buyers and sellers of rhino horn in South Africa still need to apply for a permit, so that the government can keep tabs on the commodity.

John Hume, the world’s biggest rhino rancher who owns around 1,300 of the animals, said he was hoping to sell some of his stock of five tonnes.

“We will certainly try and sell some rhino horn very shortly,” he said.

 74 
 on: May 24, 2016, 05:42 AM 
Started by Rad - Last post by Rad
Wildlife shows not reflecting reality of natural world – Springwatch presenters

BBC’s Chris Packham says nature reserves are becoming ‘a bit like art galleries’ while Martin Hughes-Games raises concerns about conservation

John Plunkett
AFP
Tuesday 24 May 2016 00.01 BST

The presenters of BBC2’s Springwatch have warned that wildlife programmes are failing to reflect the reality of the natural world.

Chris Packham said there was a danger that nature reserves such as the RSPB’s Minsmere in Suffolk, where the new series of Springwatch is based, “become a bit like art galleries or museums where we go to get our fix” when much of the countryside is “largely sterile, too intensively farmed and with very poor biodiversity”.

“We shouldn’t generate the expectation that wildlife can only be found on nature reserves and I do think we as naturalists are guilty of this,” he said.

“As a consequence, we don’t see the countryside as a place to access wildlife and that’s a big problem because nature reserves occupy less than 2% of the UK’s land surface.

“It’s a mindset thing. Nature reserves are great but, whilst you are driving there, you should have the expectation of seeing wildlife too, not just dead pheasants on the side of the road.”

The long-running BBC2 show, which returns on Monday 30 May, will encourage viewers to “do something great for nature”.

But Packham’s co-presenter, Martin Hughes-Games, said half a century of natural history programmes did not appear to have had the effect of getting more people interested in conservation or saving species from going extinct.

“I become increasingly concerned that – not Springwatch so much – but the more spectacular blue chip series that suggest there is this wonderful utopian world of wildlife out there that has no human interference at all. I fear those beautiful seductive programmes are not balanced by a clearer idea of what is going on and the loss of habitat,” said Hughes-Games.

“It’s almost like a drug. We love it and we come back and we lose ourselves in the beauty of these places, not realising that the habitats they are being filmed in are getting tinier and tinier. We don’t reflect that.”

Packham said he would not be intimidated by the Countryside Alliance, which called on the BBC to sack him after he criticised leading conservation groups for sitting on the fence over foxhunting, badger culling and the plight of hen harriers.

The presenter said he drew a line between the content of the BBC2 programme and what he said on other platforms. He also writes a column for BBC Wildlife magazine.

“My campaigning is separate from the BBC, for obvious reasons,” said Packham. “One of the things I most forthrightly champion is the BBC’s independence and impartiality and I wouldn’t want to compromise that in any way.

“I base my personal campaigning on a basis of good solid science so I am not driven emotionally. I am driven by what the evidence says at the time and with that foundation comes confidence that those of us who take that stance are right, so obviously we are not easily intimidated.”

The new series, which will run for three weeks, hopes to take cameras inside a weasel’s nest for the first time.

The programme will feature golden eagles in Scotland and follow in close-up the travails of a little owl and its three eggs. It will also look at how the unseasonably warm spring has affected wildlife across the UK.

In an echo of the “Delia effect”, when sales of ingredients soar after being featured by Delia Smith, the RSPB said sales of nest boxes with in-built cameras grew 50% as a result of their use on Springwatch.

It will be the third time Springwatch has been based in Minsmere. Last year, a stickleback fish called Spineless Si became the unlikely star of the show. Some critics suggested the show went too far in giving some of the animals names, but the show’s third co-presenter, Michaela Strachan, begged to differ.

“If we gave every animal a name it would go too far; we only pick certain ones,” she said. “People don’t remember the blue tits we didn’t give a name to, but they remember Runty; they remember Sophia La Wren.

“Last year it was Spineless Si. Nobody knew that putting a camera in a muddy bit of river would generate such a fantastic story. That’s what I really look forward to. He was the underdog and he didn’t look terribly interesting, and then he was the winner.”

 75 
 on: May 24, 2016, 05:39 AM 
Started by Rad - Last post by Rad
Black bears flock to claim food in evacuated Fort McMurray homes

After wildfires prompted a frenzied evacuation in the Canadian city, the scent of garbage and rotting food is drawing in many of Alberta’s 40,000 bears

Ashifa Kassam in Toronto
AFP
Monday 23 May 2016 17.32 BST

First came the wildfire; raging through the northern Alberta city of Fort McMurray and prompting the frenzied evacuation of more than 88,000 people.

Then came the bears.

Authorities say black bears have been roaming the evacuated city in greater numbers, disoriented by the destruction of their natural habitat and lured by the scent of garbage and rotting food in the city.

“What we’ve got is tons of spoiling food inside houses in the heart of prime black bear range,” Lee Foote, a conservation biologist at the University of Alberta, told Canadian broadcaster CTV News. “You couldn’t create a better potential to attract black bears from a large area … and there are a lot of black bears in the area.”

The province of Alberta is home to an estimated 40,000 bears, many of which live in the boreal forests that surround Fort McMurray.

The fire – which now covers more than 522,000 hectares – came just as black bears were emerging from their dens after six months of hibernation and finding ashes or dusty conditions where they would normally encounter food. A smorgasbord of tantalising scents – from rotting fish and meat to leftover casseroles – brought many of them into nearby Fort McMurray, where food-filled refrigerators and freezers now sit sweltering in homes often left without power.

“They are smart and adaptive. They can smell food from kilometers away,” Brendan Cox, a spokesman for the province’s fish and wildlife enforcement branch told Reuters. “Just as you and I go to the nearby grocery store, or our favourite restaurant, the bears continue to return to a particular food source.”

Officials have said residents may be able to return to the city as early as next week, one month after they hurriedly fled amid a thick blanket of heavy smoke and flames that licked the highways.

Many of the bears are expected to leave the city when residents return, as black black bears are typically not aggressive and rarely attack humans.

In the three weeks since the city’s evacuation, though, some bears have become habituated to food sources in Fort McMurray, say conservationists. “This is going to be a different type of emboldened, entitled bear, if you will,” said Foote. “They have had free rein of the place for a while, it’s prime fattening-up season just out of hibernation, and it could be a problem.”

Wildlife officers are currently patrolling the city, setting traps at the first signs of bear habituation. At least four bears have been captured so far, two of which were released back into the wild.

Two had to be euthanised over concerns that they could pose a threat to humans, wildlife officials told Reuters. “Officers feel the same distaste as members of the public feel for putting a bear down,” said Cox.

 76 
 on: May 24, 2016, 05:37 AM 
Started by Rad - Last post by Rad
Volunteers with crossbows embark on Madrid wild boar cull

Fifty-five hunters aim to rid suburbs of thriving nuisance but animal rights groups say their method is inhumane

Stephen Burgen in Barcelona
AFP
Monday 23 May 2016 17.27 BST

A group of 55 volunteer hunters armed with crossbows are working with the Madrid authorities to cull wild boar encroaching on the city’s suburbs.

Declining numbers of hunters and few predators mean the population of wild boar, is increasing rapidly. The animals destroy vegetation and frequently cause traffic accidents.

“There are between 36,000 and 40,000 wild boar in the Madrid area,” said Javier Sintes, a member of the volunteer group.

“The population is increasing in giant steps. They suffer from few diseases, there are no predators in the region and they’re omnivorous so it’s easy for them to find food. A female can produce 10 young in a year.”

Sintes insists that a crossbow is a humane way of killing. “The arrow, because it makes such a large wound, doesn’t give the animal time to feel pain and in less than a minute it loses consciousness and a minute later dies from lack of oxygen,” he said.

The animal rights group Peta disputed this claim. “As the tragic killing of Cecil the lion taught us, animals shot with high-powered crossbows can suffer for hours and even days before they bleed to death,” said its associate director Elisa Allen.

“Several studies indicate that bowhunting yields a 50% wounding rate, which means that for every animal dragged from the woods by a bow hunter, one is left wounded to suffer and die slowly and painfully.”

Wild boar are not just a problem for Madrid. Over 1,000 of the creatures live in the Collserola park on the edge of Barcelona, and in the mornings they can often be found snuffling around the private clinics in the exclusive Zona Alta area of the city. At least 200 are now resident in the upmarket satellite town of Sant Cugat.

Last year, one was spotted in Barcelona city centre and another was seen by the main Sants railway station. There are an estimated 100,000-120,000 wild boar in Catalonia alone, five times the number there were 25 years ago.

The animals have also recolonised parts of Scandinavia and the UK where they have been extinct for centuries.

The Madrid government is also seeking volunteers to help cull 2,500 mountain goats over the next five years.

 77 
 on: May 24, 2016, 05:35 AM 
Started by Rad - Last post by Rad
CS Monitor

Drones and wildlife: Do researchers need a set of best practices?

Drones can be a valuable resource in wildlife protection efforts, but researchers should also understand the potential negative effects on the animals they are trying to help.

By Story Hinckley, Staff May 23, 2016   

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or drones, can help protect wildlife – but they can make animals dangerously stressed out, finds a study published Monday.

Two researchers from The University of Adelaide's Unmanned Research Aircraft Facility (URAF), PhD candidate Jarrod Hodgson and professor Lian Pin Koh, published a report in the Cell Press journal Current Biology that suggests a set of best practices for researchers to follow when employing drones around wildlife.

"Considering the growing popularity of UAVs as a tool among field biologists, we advocate for the precautionary principle to manage these risks," write the authors in their article, which is expected to be published Monday. "Specifically, we provide a suite of recommendations as the basis for a code of best practice in the use of UAVs in the vicinity of animals or for the purpose of animal research, which supplement current standards in animal field research and reporting."

Along with adopting the precautionary principle, Mr. Koh and Mr. Hodgson suggest adhering to civil aviation rules, which can include restrictions on flying above a certain altitude, at night or within a certain proximity to people and infrastructure. UAVs should also minimize visual and audio output as much as possible.

It may even be beneficial, suggest Koh and Hodgson, to design the shape and color of UAVs with the relevant environment in mind. UAVs can be modified "to mimic non-threatening wildlife" native to the area, such as a local, non-predatory bird.

"We encourage authors to be proactive in sharing suggestions for improving UAV best practices in biological field research and also to guide the regulation of recreational use," write the authors. "Promoting the awareness, development and uptake of a code of best practice in the use of UAVs will improve their suitability as a low impact ecological survey tool."

But this is not the first time researchers have warned of implications from UAVs. 

Last year a team of researchers from the University of Minnesota tracked the stress levels of bears through heart rate monitors to analyze potential implications from nearby drones. And while their study was small in scope, they say the results are clear: Bears' heart rate rises when drones are nearby. One individual, for example, increased his heart rate from 40 beats per minute to 160.

"I would never advocate for stopping further use of drones [in wildlife research]," Mark Ditmer, lead author of last year's bear study, tells The Christian Science Monitor. "But maybe we use some caution until we have a better understanding of the best practices."

And while increased heart rates are not in themselves dangerous, adds Dr. Ditmer, drone-induced stress may cause important "behavior changes" such as running away into dangerous territory. Also, animals may become accustomed to the sound of drones and ignore future human sounds that do warrant a fight or flight response.   

Several animals – including two birds, a kangaroo and a chimpanzee – have even taken their drone-induced stress out on the machines themselves, attacking them mid-flight.

However, with the wary precautions come other examples of UAVs' potential in wildlife conservation.

Last year the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) began employing unmanned aerial vehicles to study whales. By hovering 100 to 150 feet above a whale pod, scientists can track the health of individual whales and the population numbers at large.

"We can't put a gray whale on a scale," said John Durban, a marine mammal biologist with NOAA, "but we can use aerial images to analyze their body condition – basically, how fat or skinny they are."

And through Air Shepherd, a Minnesota-based nonprofit, drones are fighting back against poachers in Africa. Patrolling for poachers can be a dangerous job that carries the potential for park rangers to be shot or expensive equipment to be destroyed. But drones can offer a safer, yet equally successful, solution.

"The silent, unmanned aircraft can be launched and flown constantly during high-probability poaching hours – often overnight when patrols by humans would be dangerous – and in areas prone to poaching activity," writes David Karas for the Monitor last year. "Infrared cameras and GPS technology in each drone relay data back to a mobile command post. When a potential poacher is spotted, the precise location can be relayed to park rangers, who can respond, investigate, and, if needed, apprehend poachers before any animals are killed."

Air Shepherd's drone patrols have a 93-percent accuracy rate in predicting poaching activity. In an area that previously witnessed 19 rhino killings each month, there have been zero deaths for six months while drones were deployed overhead.

Koh and Hodgson are optimistic that UAVs can be used safely and conscientiously around wildlife, the potential implications just have to be communicated.

"In our experience, the vast majority of UAV users, both biologists and hobbyists, do not want to disturb wildlife and will often seek advice from experts," says Hodgson in a press release.

"However, in some cases, users may be unaware that their UAV operations could be causing considerable and unnecessary disturbance. By promoting an awareness of the potential for UAVs to impact wildlife, we hope that users will be more conscious of the potential impacts and utilize the code to ensure their UAV operations are responsible."

 78 
 on: May 24, 2016, 05:32 AM 
Started by Rad - Last post by Rad
CS Monitor

Tortoise injured in a forest fire gets a 3D-printed shell

The tortoise is among a slew of animals benefiting from advances in 3D printing technology.

By Lonnie Shekhtman, Staff May 23, 2016   

A 3D printed shell has given a new life to a badly burned tortoise that was found by the side of the road in Brazil in 2015, with its shell heavily damaged.

The new shell was designed and printed by a Sao Paulo group of volunteers that includes veterinarians, a 3D designer, and a dental surgeon, who together are working to save injured animals using 3D-printed prosthetics to replace damaged or missing limbs. They call themselves Animal Avengers.

“We first came together as friends because of our common love of science and our love for animals,” Roberto Fecchio, one of the group’s members, told the Daily Mail. “We soon realized we could do some extraordinary work using cutting-edge technology to push back the boundaries of life-saving care for mutilated animals by giving them customized prostheses,” he said.

The tortoise, which the Avengers named Freddy because her "back looked like the face of Freddy Krueger," as ABC reported, had been the victim of a fire in 2015 that destroyed 85 percent of her shell, which is critical protection from predators.

To save Freddy, the Avengers’s 3D designer compared photos of her to that of a healthy tortoise, and then used computer modeling to design a custom prosthetic hull based on Freddy’s measurements. The design was sent to the group’s dental surgeon, who used a desktop 3D printer to create a four-piece shell that fit together like a jigsaw puzzle, as the Daily Mail explains.

The shell was then surgically attached to Freddy and even hand-painted by an artist to look authentic. The group reports to the Daily Mail that Freddy returned to full mobility.

The Avengers also have used this technique to print new beaks for a toucan, a goose, a parrot, and a macaw.

Many other animals have benefited from advances in 3D printing, including Derby, a dog born with deformed front legs. A 3D design and printing company in Rock Hill, S.C., called 3D Systems, printed a pair of prosthetics that allowed Derby to walk, run, and sit for the first time.

The company designed a figure-8 pattern with a central junction that flexes like a knee, as CNet reports.

It used a technology called Selective Laser Sintering, which uses a laser to harden and bond together tiny grains of plastic. The same technology was used to print the lightweight midsoles for New Balance shoes, according to CNet.

“A wonderful thing that came out of all that is that it really inspired people,” said Tara Anderson, a 3D Systems director, in a video about the project to create legs for Derby. “And that was a very humbling experience to be a part of.”

 79 
 on: May 24, 2016, 05:28 AM 
Started by Rad - Last post by Rad
CS Monitor

Could biodegradeable six-pack rings save the sea turtles?

A Florida beverage company has helped invent biodegradable and edible rings that, if used widely, it hopes could reduce the harmful impact of plastics on oceans and wildlife.

By Lonnie Shekhtman, Staff May 24, 2016   

A Florida craft beer maker has replaced the harmful plastic of six-pack rings with ones made out of the barley and wheat leftover from the beermaking process.

In a project led by New York ad agency We Believers, the partners have engineered rings that are biodegradable and perhaps even edible – although this has not be proven – by marine animals that often fall victim to entanglement, strangulation, and deadly digestive problems caused by the ubiquitous rings that are used to package cans of soda and beer and end up in the oceans and in other natural habitats.

“We believed in it so much,” Chris Gove, Saltwater Brewery president, told Mashable. “It came about through a love for the ocean and truly caring for the environment.”

The edible rings are patent pending, with 500 of them produced last month as a prototype. Gove told Mashable that his team hopes to produce the rings widely by early fall, and by 2017 to spread the invention to other craft breweries.

Test your knowledge Under the Sea: How much do you know about our watery planet? Take our quiz!
Photos of the Day Photos of the day 05/23

"I think it's a really neat idea," Mike Harting, chief executive officer of 3 Daughters Brewing in St. Petersburg, Fla., told the Tampa Bay Times. "The industry needs other options, and the fact someone has found one that happens to be eco-friendly, too, that's awesome."

For now the edible 6-pack rings cost a few cents more than the plastic ones, which run about $.10 apiece, but that price could come down if the new rings are widely adopted by the beverage industry.

"The kind of support we're being met with, assuming that holds, that could happen," brewery co-founder Bo Eaton told the Times.

Plastic debris is accumulating in the oceans at an alarming rate. And it’s everywhere: floating in the deep sea, buried in Arctic ice, and being ingested with deadly consequences for about 700 species of marine wildlife.

In 2010 about 8 million tons of plastic trash ended up in the ocean from coastal countries, an amount that is likely to increase tenfold in the next decade without changes to garbage collection and management, according to a study described last year by National Geographic. That amount of plastic is like lining up five grocery bags of trash on every foot of coastline around the globe, explains a study author.

“And by 2025, those five grocery bags of plastic are going to be ten bags," Jenna Jambeck, the University of Georgia environmental engineer who led the study, told National Geographic.

While the biodegradable rings are promising, but it’s not yet clear whether they’re safe for marine wildlife to ingest, since wheat and barley are not part of their natural diet. Research is needed to determine this.

“Obviously it’s better than plastic, there’s no doubt about that,” Jennie Gilbert, co-founder of Cairns Turtle Rehabilitation Centre in Australia, told Australian Geographic. “But does it cause a long-term effect if they ingest it, does it cause problems? We don’t know that,” she said.

Click to watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YG9gUJMGyw

 80 
 on: May 24, 2016, 05:25 AM 
Started by Rad - Last post by Rad
CS Monitor

Are regulators doing enough to prevent another mine waste disaster?

New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas is seeking mine waste controls in the wake of the spill into the Animas River last year.

By Olivia Lowenberg, Staff May 24, 2016   

The environmental disaster at Gold King Mine in Colorado may have occurred a year ago, but New Mexico's top prosecutor says little progress has been made in addressing the issue since then.

"I am disappointed by the continued unwillingness to respond to the New Mexico Environment Department's numerous attempts to resolve this matter diplomatically and outside of court," New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas said in a statement. "The safe and peaceful livelihood of our citizens should override any political or scientific indifferences that we face."

Mr. Balderas wrote to both the head of the Environmental Protection Agency and officials in Colorado, alerting them that New Mexico is considering suing the agency, the state of Colorado, and the two mining companies involved in the disaster.

An EPA spokeswoman told the Associated Press that the agency takes responsibility for the cleanup of the spill. The Gold King Mine disaster occurred when a cleanup crew, led by members of the EPA, triggered a wastewater spill of over 3 million gallons that eventually fouled the waters of rivers in three Western states. Two Native American communities, the Navajo and Ute tribes, also remain negatively affected by the environmental damage from the spill.

A federal investigation last October faulted the EPA for its role in the spill, finding that the way the EPA conducted its water level tests in the mine contributed directly to the blowout in the mine. The report, by the US Department of the Interior, attributed the spill to the EPA's failure to properly assess the amount of wastewater.

In April, the EPA announced that it would reimburse the affected states, tribes, and local governments about $1 million for costs associated with cleaning up the spill. Although the EPA says water quality returned to pre-spill levels almost immediately after the incident, Balderas and other officials are still concerned about toxic chemicals lingering in the soil or collecting in runoff from rain and snow.

Balderas described the spill as a catastrophe in his letters.

"Following this tragic incident, our greatest concern should be ensuring that the people and the lands we live on are free from hazardous materials," he wrote.

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
Video