Hi All,
I've just been reading through this part of evolutionary necessity
and karma question and "coincidentally" it closely relates to some of
the experiences I am having right now in my life .....I have tr. pluto on my sun
Anyway, in regards to this I’d like to add my views, hope that's
okay...?? :-)
I think there is no differentiation in essence between karma and
evolutionary necessity...it may SEEM like but only if we looking at
a little segment of evolution and not the whole lot where
everything connects to everything...
For every evolutionary necessity leads to karma, and every karmic
condition meant to promote evolution...therefore it represents
evolutionary necessity at the end....One comes out of the other and
then connects back to it...like everything in creation.....
Evolutionary necessity means that, there is something the soul has
to embrace that it hasn't yet. So needs to learn something that it
didn't know before. When that is resisted it will be missing from
the intended consciousness...and that leads to consequences.
For anything WE DONT KNOW or didn't embrace yet is and WAS part of
our overall consciousness and based on that we made choices that
lead to actions of some kinds and that is what creating our
karma...
Is it not so Rad?
To me it seems, the need to overcome the whatever limitation that
create the "evolutionary necessity" is coming out of the mistakes
of past choices and actions.....of course there is a difference
doing something deliberately “wrong” or doing it out of a
misunderstanding false belief getting something half right half wrong etc...yet both leads to consequences and
that's the point. Karma is simply the consequences of all our past
choices..good and bad....all together.....yet ALL that is for
evolutionary purposes thus it is evolutionary necessity....
With a very simple example: let say a Mormon (or whatever
religious) mother doesn’t allow her child to be given blood because
she TRULY believes it is a sin to interfere and her child will be
healed by god and will be punished if interference allowed. She
sincerely wants the very best for her child relative to her
beliefs, consciousness level and knowledge that she has at that
time. And of course the result is that the child dies. What a
trauma and disillusionment. More than likely it will take life
times for the soul to recover want on earth happened here.
But question is: is this “evolutionary necessity” or “karma”?
For I think it is both...can not be otherwise...I think it is
always both
Of course there is a difference if the mother wanted to kill her
child. But what if she didn’t and yet she still did by the choice
and the actions she made based on confusion, misbelief etc. This
too will create karma and not so easy for sure.
Yet it can be very easily misunderstood if we differentiate between
the two let say in one reading it may sounds like she didn’t do
anything wrong (well she did out of misunderstanding) or the other
way around, saying she has a horrible karma for killing her
child...
I think both view would lack the other part of the truth...
I think none of them will be true in itself...and evolution if
filled with actions out of misunderstandings of all kinds...
If we looking at the deeper aspect of human evolution and
understand that every single choice is always a mixture of right
and wrong beliefs for we are never fully aware of everything there
is always something for us to learn...this I think is the key...
Like let a soul have been extremely sadistic in past lives...and
done horrendous things to many others...however the soul’s
consciousness was consensus and was not able to think for itself
although it still has personal responsibility of course as each of
us do. Yet in the bigger picture it seems to me the fact needs to
be taken into consideration that the soul was not able to see it’s
own downfall it didn't have the capacity in the consensus state. So
it got deeper and deeper into denial because the soul felt
absolutely horrible and it didn’t know why. It didn't know anything
better but the consensus and followed that... was trying to ever
more forcefully get rid of what it thought was the problem:
others... And yet everthing got worst...the rage and anger lead to
soul to torture and harm many people BUT THAT WAS THE WAY CONSENSUS LEADERS OPERATED..all of them...one justified the other. Again the soul could not think for itself. So while there is a lot of
negative karma it is not only that it also fuels the evolutionary
necessity to come out of the 3rd consensus and out of the inner
horror the soul feels which actually accelerates evolution...
So the karma itself becomes the very heart of evolutionary
necessity even in this case....to embrace something to
consciousness which will parashoot the soul to a totally different
level at the end...
I feel it would be a mistake to perceive this as a purely karmic
condition...it includes and leads to evolutionary necessity...
Does this make sense?
For I personally feel that it is really important to clarify this...I
feel that categorising things like evolutionary necessity and karma
are different things we may saw the old harmful seeds in a new way
leading to possible misunderstandings, like souls may continue the
deeply ingrained beliefs of inferiority/ superiority that damaged
ALL OF US so deeply for so long......
For example it may lead people to believe things like:
"Oh, the square, opposition whatever, in my chart simply is an
evolutionary necessity while somebody elses square etc. is karma
meaning of course THEY have done something ‘wrong’ while I of
course have not.“
While others who have the inclination to the opposite side may
assume inwardly:
“Oh I knew something was wrong with me, MY squares etc. are
different, I MUST have done something wrong, while other people's
chart of course reflect only evolutionary necessity via their
stressful aspects."
Can you see what I mean Rad? .... hope it's okay to say this??
Love and blessings,
Lia
