Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Determination of Phasal Relationship - Nodes, Planets - Tr & Natal  (Read 866 times)
Linda
Most Active Member
***
Posts: 881



« on: Oct 01, 2012, 06:17 PM »





Planetary Speeds
[from fastest to slowest]
Ascendant/Midheaven, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Vesta, Juno, Ceres, Pallas, Lucifer, Jupiter,
Moon’s South and North Nodes, Saturn, Chiron, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, Sun (Upasika)

Motion of Lunar Nodes
The mean motion of the Lunar Nodes is retrograde in all charts, even if the Nodes are direct in a specific chart.
In all cases the Nodes enter a sign at 29 degrees and exit at 0 degrees. (Steve)


Hi Rad,

Could you please tell me if these Phasal Relationships are correct:

Natal North Node in balsamic phase in relation to Natal Neptune (What is the correct wording for this aspect please?)

Transiting Mars balsamic conjunction Transiting North Node

Transiting North Node new phase conjunction Natal North Node (a recent Nodal Return;  a new cycle now beginning)

Transiting North Node in balsamic phase in relation to Natal Neptune (Correct wording?)

Transiting Mars balsamic conjunction Natal North Node (ending a cycle, with a new cycle beginning soon)

Transiting Mars in first phase in relation to Natal Neptune (Correct wording?)


Thanks for your time and expertise.

Linda

« Last Edit: Feb 09, 2013, 06:14 PM by Linda » Logged
Rad
Moderator
Most Active Member
*****
Posts: 17002


« Reply #1 on: Oct 02, 2012, 06:44 AM »



Planetary Speeds
[from fastest to slowest]
Ascendant/Midheaven, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Vesta, Juno, Ceres, Pallas, Lucifer, Jupiter,
Moon’s South and North Nodes, Saturn, Chiron, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, Sun (Upasika)

Motion of Lunar Nodes
The mean motion of the Lunar Nodes is retrograde in all charts, even if the Nodes are direct in a specific chart.
In all cases the Nodes enter a sign at 29 degrees and exit at 0 degrees. (Steve)


Hi Rad,

Could you please tell me if these Phasal Relationships are correct:

Natal North Node in balsamic phase in relation to Natal Neptune (What is the correct wording for this aspect please?)

**********

Yes. Neptune is in a balsamic phase with the Natal North Node.

*************

Transiting Mars balsamic conjunction Transiting North Node

*************

Yes

*****************

Transiting North Node new phase conjunction Natal North Node (a recent Nodal Return;  a new cycle now beginning)

****************

No, this is still a balsamic phase

****************

Transiting North Node in balsamic phase in relation to Natal Neptune (Correct wording?)

*****************

Yes, you have the correct working here.

*****************

Transiting Mars balsamic conjunction Natal North Node (ending a cycle, with a new cycle beginning soon)

************

Yes

**************

Transiting Mars in first phase in relation to Natal Neptune (Correct wording?)

************

Yes. Transiting Mars is in New Phase relative to Natal Neptune.

*************

God Bless, Rad

Logged
Linda
Most Active Member
***
Posts: 881



« Reply #2 on: Oct 02, 2012, 10:47 PM »



Transiting North Node new phase conjunction Natal North Node (a recent Nodal Return;  a new cycle now beginning)

No, this is still a balsamic phase

****************

Hi Rad,

Not wishing to contradict you, but just trying to understand why this aspect is still in a balsamic phase.  The Transiting North Node has traveled past the Natal North Node by 28 minutes. Could you please explain why this aspect is still in the balsamic phase?

Thanks again,

Linda
« Last Edit: Feb 09, 2013, 06:15 PM by Linda » Logged
Rad
Moderator
Most Active Member
*****
Posts: 17002


« Reply #3 on: Oct 03, 2012, 06:37 AM »

Hi Linda,

"Not wishing to contradict you, but just trying to understand why this aspect is still in a balsamic phase.  The Transiting North Node has traveled past the Natal North Node by 28 minutes. Could you please explain why this aspect is still in the balsamic phase?"

*********

Your are right, and I am wrong. I was pretty blurry eyed when I read your post Linda which became a bit worse going through your examples. So contradict me anytime I am wrong.

God Bless, Rad


Logged
Linda
Most Active Member
***
Posts: 881



« Reply #4 on: Oct 03, 2012, 02:26 PM »

The figures on the diagram were probably a bit hard to see clearly.

Thanks for the clarification.

Linda
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: